New Jersey Security Guard Practice Exam

In what circumstance is it appropriate for a security guard to show physical restraint?

1. During all encounters with the public

2. Only when it is part of emergency evacuation procedures

3. When there is a direct threat to themselves or others and when necessary for safety

4. When they believe a law has been broken

The correct answer is: When there is a direct threat to themselves or others and when necessary for safety

The most appropriate circumstance for a security guard to show physical restraint is when there is a direct threat to themselves or others and when necessary for safety. This principle is grounded in the responsibility of security personnel to ensure a safe environment. If a security guard assesses that an individual poses an imminent threat, their primary duty is to protect the safety of all parties involved—this includes not only the individuals directly involved in the incident but also bystanders and themselves. The use of physical restraint in this context is typically justified as a means to de-escalate a potentially dangerous situation. Importantly, the application of physical restraint must always be proportional and reasonable. Excessive force should be avoided, and the response should align with the level of threat posed. In this regard, showing restraint is seen not as a demonstration of aggression, but as an essential action aimed at preventing harm. Furthermore, relying solely on physical restraint in every encounter or as a standard procedure is not advisable, as it could escalate situations unnecessarily. Similarly, the idea that physical restraint should only be employed during emergency evacuations does not encompass the full scope of a security guard's duties. Finally, merely suspecting a law has been broken does not provide sufficient grounds for physical restraint without the presence of